🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has transformed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue things like Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.