🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts regarding the comments made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Even if the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the world entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive power on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless move around with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his potential.

Fritz has made a several significant, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing slump of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he finally did convert one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much effort to win it. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {